Re: OT - people v computer
- From: Bruce Hartweg <bruce-news@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:32:20 GMT
Uwe Klein wrote:
Bruce Hartweg wrote:yup. i think he saved money to by not needing a spacebar on his keyboard ;)
this reminds me of some code I periodically have to look atsome smarts smart, eh?
written long ago by a very smart guy- cool algorithms and such,
but completely unreadable, it was Fortran, used named blocks (which
overlapped on purpose) and the kicker was not only zero comments
but also zero whitespace - vertically *and* horizontally!
so he was optimizing the compile step!
Bruce
uwe
Bruce
PS
did i mention his functions had not only multiple exit points, but
multiple entry points? and purposely used the overlapping blocks
so that h[23] was the same exact memory as g[154] ?
now try to recode an that algorithm in C - or better yet, get handed
a C program that had a subtle bug, then be told that it was a port
of the ugly fortran and be asked to find the bug. 3 weeks of my life
I'll never get back.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT - people v computer
- From: tom.rmadilo
- Re: OT - people v computer
- From: Uwe Klein
- Re: OT - people v computer
- References:
- Call by Reference
- From: Andreas Leitgeb
- Re: Call by Reference
- From: Andreas Leitgeb
- Re: Call by Reference
- From: Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: Call by Reference
- From: Andreas Leitgeb
- Re: Call by Reference
- From: Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: Call by Reference
- From: Andreas Leitgeb
- Re: Call by Reference
- From: Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: Call by Reference
- From: tom.rmadilo
- OT - people v computer
- From: Bruce Hartweg
- Re: OT - people v computer
- From: Uwe Klein
- Call by Reference
- Prev by Date: Re: Command names - a suggestion...
- Next by Date: Re: lambda... again
- Previous by thread: Re: OT - people v computer
- Next by thread: Re: OT - people v computer
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|