Re: Update using teacup
- From: "Donal K. Fellows" <donal.k.fellows@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:06:32 +0100
Alexandre Ferrieux wrote:
You're right, [teacup update] is even documented as including [teacup
list --only unknown], which means "Everything I carefully left out so
far" ;-). So it's easy to be either ultra-thin or ultra-fat, but not
in between... If you enter a feature request asking for a --only flag
to [teacup update], I'll support it !
Or you could wrap a Tcl script around teacup that gets the output from
'teacup list' (yes, it's available in an easy-to-parse form if you ask
nicely) and then feeds the results through 'teacup install'. After all,
the documentation for 'teacup update' basically lists what it's doing
anyway, so you should be able to figure out how to adapt...
(Alas, it won't be as efficient as 'teacup update' so it is worth
pursuing the extra options.)
Donal.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Update using teacup
- From: Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: Update using teacup
- References:
- Update using teacup
- From: Robert Hicks
- Re: Update using teacup
- From: Alexandre Ferrieux
- Update using teacup
- Prev by Date: TEA platforms?
- Next by Date: Re: TEA platforms?
- Previous by thread: Re: Update using teacup
- Next by thread: Re: Update using teacup
- Index(es):