Re: Limiting resources used by scripts on web server
- From: "Donal K. Fellows" <donal.k.fellows@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:30:53 +0100
Alexandre Ferrieux wrote:
Well, it was my understanding that this private part was just a cache
of bounded size, and that beyond this threshold everything was in
anonymous malloc()s...
That's possibly true. I'd need to read the source to be sure. But in any
case, it's still pretty easy to do thread-level accounting of memory;
there's always a current thread available when you're doing a malloc().
Donal.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Limiting resources used by scripts on web server
- From: Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: Limiting resources used by scripts on web server
- References:
- Limiting resources used by scripts on web server
- From: graeme.pietersz@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Limiting resources used by scripts on web server
- From: Gerald W. Lester
- Re: Limiting resources used by scripts on web server
- From: graeme.pietersz@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Limiting resources used by scripts on web server
- From: Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: Limiting resources used by scripts on web server
- From: Donal K. Fellows
- Re: Limiting resources used by scripts on web server
- From: Alexandre Ferrieux
- Limiting resources used by scripts on web server
- Prev by Date: Re: Handling output from ldapsearch
- Next by Date: clock format does not run in window service
- Previous by thread: Re: Limiting resources used by scripts on web server
- Next by thread: Re: Limiting resources used by scripts on web server
- Index(es):