Re: after ids
- From: Ralf Fassel <ralfixx@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:38:30 +0200
* Kevin Kenny <kennykb@xxxxxxx>
| [make your NTP infrastructure work!]
| It also fails to address the concerns of those who deal with systems
| that have only intermittent network connectivity or lack it
| altogether. (Tcl gets ported to some very strange places, indeed.)
For the record: we use TCL/Windows in 24/7 production lines with no
network at all, and the absolute computer clock time is of no
importance there. What is important is that the 20ms/1s schedule
timers really run all the time and not getting delayed once or twice a
year by an hour when DST changes. So I'm all in favor of [after]
getting changed to reliably work with relative times...
R'
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: after ids
- From: Kevin Kenny
- Re: after ids
- References:
- Re: after ids
- From: Fredderic
- Re: after ids
- From: Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: after ids
- From: Donald Arseneau
- Re: after ids
- From: Donal K. Fellows
- Re: after ids
- From: Kevin Kenny
- Re: after ids
- Prev by Date: Re: after ids
- Next by Date: Re: after ids
- Previous by thread: Re: after ids
- Next by thread: Re: after ids
- Index(es):