Re: Domain scokets? ceptcl?
- From: "graeme.pietersz@xxxxxxxxx" <graeme.pietersz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 31, 6:38 pm, "Gerald W. Lester" <Gerald.Les...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
graeme.piete...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:How fast are pipes? I might run into performance problems with this
What ways of using unix domain sockets from Tcl are available? ceptcl
seems to have been at 0.3 for a long time.
I found at least one extension that uses them (libmsgque), but it
seems to be doing so from C, not TCL (except indirectly).
I want a fast way of a process to communicate with children (forked
using hte fork command from Expect or TclX if it works for me). Other
methods might work for me.
Well the two common ones are pipes between parent and child, or socket on
later. yes, I know, premature optimisation, but I would rather know
the potential problem is solveable before I start.
127.0.0.1 (or localhost) on a know port (note -- the parent can use dynamicNeat way to do it, but that is definitely slower than unix domain
port allocation and pass the actual port the children as a command line arg
sockets
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Domain scokets? ceptcl?
- From: Gerald W. Lester
- Re: Domain scokets? ceptcl?
- References:
- Domain scokets? ceptcl?
- From: graeme.pietersz@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Domain scokets? ceptcl?
- From: Gerald W. Lester
- Domain scokets? ceptcl?
- Prev by Date: Re: Webservice package over https with authorization
- Next by Date: Re: why expect make the Chinese code garbled
- Previous by thread: Re: Domain scokets? ceptcl?
- Next by thread: Re: Domain scokets? ceptcl?
- Index(es):