Re: spinbox bug?

suchenwi wrote:
On 27 Aug., 15:16, Hanz <h...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To avoid this yet another incarnation of the octal problem, you might
just give a values list:
pack [spinbox .s -values {
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23
}]
instead of -from, -to, -format, -increment
Thanks, yes, I tried this, but to my surprize you can see still funny
behavior around with the '09' list element, as if it is somehow still
inspected. Still, I guess this is the only solution...

If you do any arithmetic with the strings 08 and 09, you'd better
[scan] the numeric value out of them before doing that. Just spinning
over them shows no problem here.
Right, I had a validation command still checking the field for non-integer user entry, and indeed the 'string is integer 09' fails. Tricky!

Thanks, Hans
.